Self-scoring tool

Which validation software fits your team?

Score the seven dimensions by how much they matter for your team, then answer three questions about your situation. We will show which of the four categories of validation software fits, and we will be honest if the answer is not us. Read the full framework in our buyer guide.


The seven dimensions

For each dimension, rate how much it matters for your team. There is no wrong answer; different teams weigh these differently.

Protocol depth
Medium

How much narrative, rationale, and risk-informed test design you expect in a protocol, vs. a flat list of test steps.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Acceptance criteria quality
Medium

How much it matters that criteria are measurable, traced to URS or design inputs, and defensible to an auditor.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Regulatory mapping
Medium

Whether the tool needs to cite the right predicate regulations, standards, and guidance in context.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Risk basis
Medium

How much your protocols are scoped from a risk register or FMEA rather than a fixed checklist.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Change control & audit trail
Medium

How much you need version control, e-sigs, and tamper-evident audit trail inside the tool itself.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Output format & audit readiness
Medium

How much it matters that exports come out audit-ready without manual reformatting.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical
Data integrity
Medium

How much you need ALCOA+ level integrity for the data captured during execution.

SkipLowMediumHighCritical

Three quick questions about your situation

How big is your validation team?
What is your QMS situation?
How many sites or geographies do you operate in?

We use essential cookies for authentication and security. With your consent, we also use Microsoft Clarity on our marketing pages to understand how visitors navigate the site. Learn more.